top of page

The Real Issue: How Processes Have Evolved "Failure Mode #2: Excessive Handoffs"


Failure Mode #2: Excessive Handoffs

When ownership is unclear, work starts changing hands and excessive handoffs become the next constraint.

Excessive Handoffs
Excessive Handoffs

Work doesn’t move forward—it moves around.

From inbox to inbox. From queue to queue. From team to team.

Each handoff looks reasonable in isolation.  Together, they quietly become the process.


Excessive handoffs usually accumulate for good reasons:

  • Capacity was uneven

  • Risk wanted visibility

  • A workaround solved a short‑term issue

  • A temporary split became permanent


No single decision caused the problem. The pattern did.  Over time, handoffs create predictable outcomes and the collection becomes costly.


Most of the cycle time isn’t spent working, it’s spent waiting.  Context gets stripped away as work changes hands.  Ownership resets at every step. Eventually, people stop asking, “How do we complete this?” and start asking, “Who has it now?”


You can see it clearly in daily banking work:

  • Loan exceptions passed between ops, credit, and risk

  • Account maintenance routed through multiple review queues

  • Servicing issues escalated simply to get movement


The system becomes the visible bottleneck but it’s only reflecting the fragmentation upstream.  Resolving excessive handoffs isn’t about forcing work through faster.  It’s about redesigning how the work flows. 


Strong processes don’t eliminate handoffs entirely, but they are intentional about them. 


Protect ownership across the process.

When work changes hands, accountability usually disappears. Strong processes keep outcome ownership intact - even when tasks are shared.

 

Collapse steps that exist only because of trust gaps.

Many handoffs aren’t value‑adding, and they exist because upstream decisions aren’t trusted downstream.

 

Move decisions earlier.

The later a decision happens in the process, the more people feel compelled to review it.

 

Remove handoffs deliberately.

Like overlapping ownership, handoffs don’t unwind on their own. Someone has to explicitly decide which transfers no longer earn their place.


When excessive handoffs are reduced:

  • Flow improves

  • Rework drops

  • Exceptions shrink

  • Systems feel easier to work with without changing the system


This is why excessive handoffs matter.  They don’t just slow work - they change how people relate to it.

And like overlapping ownership, unwinding them is less about speed and more about design.

Comments


bottom of page